UPDATE, 3 or 4 deputies waited outside during the shooting.
.gov, specifically LEO is not legally required to protect anyone. they are not legally responsible , or more importantly, or liable for failing to protect anyone.
didn't even enter the building. just stood outside.
https://www.wptv.com/news/national/depu ... in-resigns
the general ruling from previous issues. leo/.gov can not be held accountable for failure to protect you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v. ... f_Columbia
all those places where .gov disarms people, say like state parks, state forest lands, etc, have zero legal requirement or liability for failing to protect. and, in some places, they're willing to turn you into a criminal for carrying the means to protect yourself.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/24/se ... -says.html
.gov, specifically LEO is not legally required to protect anyone. they are not legally responsible , or more importantly, or liable for failing to protect anyone.
didn't even enter the building. just stood outside.
https://www.wptv.com/news/national/depu ... in-resigns
the general ruling from previous issues. leo/.gov can not be held accountable for failure to protect you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v. ... f_Columbia
all those places where .gov disarms people, say like state parks, state forest lands, etc, have zero legal requirement or liability for failing to protect. and, in some places, they're willing to turn you into a criminal for carrying the means to protect yourself.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/24/se ... -says.html
Last edited by pick_six on Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:34 pm, edited 4 times in total.